印度国际经济关系研究委员会-数字支付在印度的扩散-基于PhonePe Pulse数据的见解(英)_第1页
印度国际经济关系研究委员会-数字支付在印度的扩散-基于PhonePe Pulse数据的见解(英)_第2页
印度国际经济关系研究委员会-数字支付在印度的扩散-基于PhonePe Pulse数据的见解(英)_第3页
印度国际经济关系研究委员会-数字支付在印度的扩散-基于PhonePe Pulse数据的见解(英)_第4页
印度国际经济关系研究委员会-数字支付在印度的扩散-基于PhonePe Pulse数据的见解(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩87页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

1

WORKING

PAPER

DIFFUSIONOFDIGITAL

PAYMENTSININDIA-

INSIGHTSBASEDON

DATAFROMPHONEPE

PULSE

MARCH2024

Abstract

Digitalisationofpaymentsisaglobaltrend,withtheCOVID-19pandemichavingtriggeredacceleratedadoption.WhileIndiahasbeenattheforefrontofthistransition,thereislittleunderstandingofhowtheUnifiedPaymentsInterface(UPI),India’sreal-timedigitalpaymentsystem,hasdiffusedandtheextentofitsinclusivescalingwithinthecountry.ThepaperreliesonstateanddistrictleveldatafromPhonePe,thelargestdigitalpaymentsplatforminIndia,tobetterunderstandtheheterogeneityinpatternsofdiffusionacrossstatesanddistrictsofIndia.Datafromvariousothersourcesareusedtoexaminehowsocio-economicfactorscorrelatewithdiffusion.

Theinitialperiodsbeginning2018aremarkedwithafewearly-adopterdistrictsthathavehighlevelsofuserpenetration.TheCOVID-19pandemicappearstohavecatalysedlarge-scaleadoptionthatresultedinlowervariationinuserpenetrationacrossdistrictsandstates.Regionsthatstartedoffwell,continuetolead,withlittlereorderingintherankingofdistrictorstates.Foraspirationaldistrictsuserpenetrationcontinuestoremainrelativelylower.Findingsfromcross-sectionalregressionssuggestthatsocio-economicindicatorssuchascertainlevelsofincome,poverty,education,digitalliteracy,andfinancialaccessarenecessarybutnotsufficientforwidespreadadoption.Policyeffortsthereforerequireadeeperunderstandingofthecostsandbenefitsofdigitalpaymentstodifferentusers,andamulti-prongedapproachtopromoteitsadoptioninwaythatisbeneficial.

Keywords:DigitalPayments,FinancialInclusion,FinancialInstitutionsandServices

JELclassification:G20,O16,O13

Authors’email:mkedia@icrier.res.in;areddy@icrier.res.in;sshukla@icrier.res.in

Acknowledgement

WearegratefultoPhonePeforsupportingtheuseoftheirdataforthispaperandforclarifyingallourquestionsrelatingtotheavailableindicators.WearegratefultoDeepakMishra,ArpitaMukherjee,ManishGoel,HavishayePuri,SaptorshiGupta,andotherresearchstaffatICRIERfortheirfeedbackonthereport.WewouldalsoliketothankNishantChadha,RohitPrasadandDileepKumarfortheirdetailedreviewofthepaperandtheircommentsthatsignificantlyhelpedimproveanearlierdraftofthepaper.Allerrorsremainourown.

Disclaimer:Opinionsandrecommendationsinthereportareexclusivelyoftheauthor(s)andnotofanyotherindividualorinstitution.Thispolicybriefhasbeenpreparedingoodfaithonthebasisofinformationavailableonthedateofpublication.Allinteractionsandtransactionswithsponsorsandtheirrepresentativeshavebeentransparentandconductedinanopen,honestandindependentmanner.

CONTENTS

1.TheGlobalSurgeinUseofDigitalPayments

1

2.DataandMethodology

4

3.StylisedFactsonDiffusionofDigitalPayments

3

4.AreStatesandDistrictsConverginginAdoptionofUPI?

4

5.Socio-economicfactorsdrivingUPIdiffusion

13

6.Conclusion

21

Keypolicytakeaways

21

References

23

Appendices

26

ListofTables

Table1:DataSourcesotherthanPhonePePulse

6

Table2:Understandingσ(sigma)andγ(gamma)convergence

10

ListofFigures

Figure1:GrowthinNumberofUniqueUPIusers

2

Figure2:UPIvis-a-visdigitalpayments

3

Figure3:GrowthinUPITransactions

7

Figure4:TransactionVolumeandValueforPhonePehavebeengrowingatasteeperratethan

registeredusers

7

Figure5:Stateswithhighinitialvaluetendtoremainontop

8

Figure6:Userpenetrationandeconomicprosperity

9

Figure7:AspirationaldistrictscontinuetolagbehindinUPIadoption

10

Figure8:Convergenceanalysisatthestate-level

11

Figure9:Convergenceanalysisatthedistrictlevel

12

Figure10:Convergenceanalysisforaspirationaldistricts

12

Figure11:RegressionResultsforUserPenetration(2022Q4)

14

Figure12:Socio-economicconditionsthatmaybenecessarybutarenotsufficientfor

diffusion(DistrictlevelscatterplotsofPhonePeUserPenetrationandsocio-economic

factors-2022Q4)

15

Figure13:ComparisonofRegressionResultsforVariousSocio-EconomicIndicators(2022Q4)17

Figure14:ComparisonofRegressionResultsforVariousMeasuresofAdoption(2022Q4)--18

Figure15:ComparisonofRegressionResultsOverTime(2022Q4vs.2018Q4)19

Figure16:ComparisonofScatterplotsovertime(2022Q4vs.2018Q4)20

DiffusionofDigitalPaymentsinIndia-InsightsbasedondatafromPhonePePulse

AartiReddy,MansiKediaandSanjanaShukla

1.TheGlobalSurgeinUseofDigitalPayments

Digitalisationofpaymentsisaglobaltrend.AccordingtotheWorldBank’sFindex,theshareofadultsmakingorreceivingdigitalpaymentsindevelopingcountriesincreasedfrom35percentin2014to57percentin20211.TheCOVID-19pandemicwasoneofthekeydriversofaccelerateddigitaladoption.However,theBankforInternationalSettlements(BIS)statedinitsrecentpublicationthatdespitestronggrowthinthevolumeandvalueofreal-timedigitalpayments,theyhavenotreplacedcash2.

Shiftingpaymentsfromcashtodigital,hasthepotentialtolowerthecostsoftransactions,andimprovetransparency,traceability,security,andfinancialinclusion.Digitalpaymentsareparticularlyhelpfulinenablingtransactionsincontextslikethepandemicwhenlimitingphysicalinteractionwasessential.Theyhavealsotransformedthenatureoftransactionsbetweenbuyersandsellers,andthedisbursementofwages,welfarepayments,pensions,andsocialprotectionbenefits.Theyhavealsoresultedinhighercostefficienciesforthebankingsector3.Inthelongrun,infrastructurefordigitalpaymentscanalsofacilitatedigitalprovisioningofotherimportantservicessuchascredit,savings,remittances,andinsurance,whichareimportantattributesofthequalityoffinancialinclusion4.

Ontheflipside,digitalpaymentscomewith

theriskofsecuritybreachesandlossofprivacy,

uncertaintydrivenbynetworkfailuresand

technicalglitches,andtherefore,canpotentially

deepenfinancialdivides.Inadequatefocuson

theseaspectscanlowerbenefitsfortheecosystem

andresultincounterproductiveoutcomes.

FastPaymentsSystemsaredrivingthegrowth

ofdigitalpaymentsacrosstheworld.Theseare

systemsinwhichthetransmissionofthepayment

messagesandavailabilityoffinalfundstothe

payeeoccurinrealtimeornear-realtime,andas

nearto24hoursaday,sevendaysaweek(24/7).

Thetechnologyunderlyingmanyfastsystems

enablenewandinnovativefunctionalitiesforend

userswhichhavebeenkeyindrivingtheirrapid

adoption5.ManyCentralBankshaveinvestedina

fastpaymentssystemthatisintegratedwiththeir

nationalpaymentssystem.ThisincludesIndia’s

ImmediatePaymentService(IMPS),China’s

InternetBankingPaymentSystem(IBPS),and

Singapore’sFastandSecureTransfers(FAST).

Overaperiodoftime,countrieshavebuilt

interoperablepaymentnetworksatopthesefast

(real-time)paymentnetworkstoalsofacilitate

retaildigitalpayments.Thesearenowcommonly

referredtoasDigitalPublicInfrastructurefor

Payments6.ExamplesincludeIndia’sUnified

PaymentsInterface(UPI),Thailand’sPromptPay,

Brazil’sPiX,Philippine’s’Instapay,andSingapore’s

PayNow.

1

/en/publication/globalfindex/Report

2

/statistics/payment

_stats/commentary2301.htm.

3Saroyetal.(2023)

4

/profile/Rajesh-Kumar-122/publication/333369877

_DIGITAL_FINANCIAL_SERVICES_IN_INDIA_AN_ANALYSIS_OF_TRENDS_IN_DIGITAL_PAYMENT/links/5eb654fca6fdcc1f1dcafcd8/DIGITAL-FINANCIAL-SERVICES-IN-INDIA-AN-ANALYSIS-OF-TRENDS-IN-DIGITAL-PAYMENT.pdf

5

/cpmi/publ/d154.pdf

;

/sites/default/files/2021-11/Fast%20Payment%20Flagship

_Final_Nov%201.pdf

6

/pdf/State

ofIndia_Digital_Economy_Report_2023.pdf;

/curated/en/099755004072288910/pdf/

P1715920edb5990d60b83e037f756213782.pdf

1

Indiaisattheforefrontofthistransformation,withthehighestvolumeofdigitalpaymentsintheworld.Over45%ofallglobalreal-timedigitaltransactionsarenowinIndia(ACI,2023).TheUnifiedPaymentsInterface(UPI),introducedbytheNationalPaymentsCorporationofIndia(NPCI)in2016,isamongthefundamentaldriversofthisgrowth.UPIhasseenrapidgrowthfromapproximately3croreuniquecustomersin2017

toover33croresaccordingtothelatestreported

data–whichamountstoapproximately24%of

theIndianpopulation(Figure1).Startingwith

only21banksin2016,ithasnowexpandedto

includeover550banksand22thirdpartyapps7.

TheUPInetworkiscurrentlydrivenbynon-bank

digitalpaymentcompanies,whichaccountfor

morethan80percentoftransactions8.

Figure1:GrowthinNumberofUniqueUPIusers

35

25

15

10

5

0

35

8

3

Mar2017Mar2018Mar2019Mar2020Mar2021Mar2022Mar2023

Source:RiseofNewEraofDigitalPaymentsReport(MinistryofI&B)and

.in/FeaturesDeatils

.aspx?NoteId=151350&ModuleId%20=%202

UPIisasubsetofdigitalpaymentsthatincludesotherretailinstrumentssuchascards,banktransfers,andmobilemoney.WhileUPItransactionscomprisedonly3%ofthevalueofdigitalpaymentsin2020-21,itaccountedformorethanhalfthenumberoftransactions(Figure2)9.Itenablesthedigitalprocessingofsmallvalue

transactionswithoutincurringthehighcostsof

alternativemethodssuchasdebitcardsandbank

transfers.Criticsoftenpointtowardsthisasa

negative–i.e.,overloadinganetworkwithtoo

manylowticket-sizedtransactions,thatcould

havebeenclearedincashatalowercosttothe

network.

7

.in/what-we-do/upi/product-statistics

;

/features/record-breaking-numbers-upi-2022-hint-india-maturing-digital

-payments-ecosystem/

8UPIEcosystemStatistics(June2022),NPCI.

.in/what-we-do/upi/upi-ecosystem-statistics

9MinistryofInformationandBroadcasting,GovernmentofIndia(2022).RiseofaNewEraofDigitalPayments.RetrievedonFebruary10,2023fromhttps://.in/WriteReadData/specificdocs/documents/2022/nov/doc20221116125801.pdf

2

Figure2:UPIvis-a-visdigitalpayments

Figure2a:Valueoftransactions

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

2017-182018-192019-202020-212021-22

Figure2b:Numberoftransactions

10,000

9,000

8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

2017-182018-192019-202020-212021-22

Source:PIB(fromRBI,NPCIandBanks)NCPIandPhonePePulse.

AnumberofstudieshavedocumentedtherapidadoptionofdigitalpaymentsinIndiaandacrosstheworld,thoughfewfocusonhowitwasdistributedandhowinclusiveitis.

Moststudiesexaminetheadoptionofdigital

paymentsduringandafterthedemonetisation

of2016andtheCOVID-19pandemic(Singhet

al.,2022;Kumaretal.,2019;Bhasinetal.,2018).

Chodorow-Reichetal.(2020)foundthatdistricts

experiencingmoreseveredemonetizationwere

10

.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1897272

3

alsooneswithreducedeconomicactivityandlowerbankcreditgrowth,butrelativelyfasteradoptionofalternativepaymenttechnologies.Lahiri(2020)foundthatareasthatwereinformalandnotveryintegratedwiththeformalfinancialnetworkwereunlikelytoadoptdigitizationinresponsetoashocklikedemonetization,suggestinganon-inclusivepatternofadoption.Whilethefindingsregardingtheeffectofdemonetizationonadoptionhasbeenmixed,studieshavefoundthatthepandemicgenerallyacceleratedadoption.ThelackofempiricalworkispartlybecausedatareportedbyNPCIonUPIisfortransactions(byvolume,value,entity)andnotadequatelyavailableforusers.WhileUPIhasreportedlygainedtractioninTier2and3cities11,thepoorerarefoundtobelesslikelytouseitthanthericher.AsurveybyNPCIfindsthatthebottom40percentofthepopulationishalfaslikelyasthetop20percenttousedigitalpayments12.Low-incomehouseholdsthatdousedigitalpayments,however,aremorelikelytouseappssuchasPaytmandPhonePethancreditcards,debitcards,andbankapps,comparedtohigherincomehouseholds.A2022OxfamreportbasedonCMIEdata,reportsamuchwidergap-withtherichest60percentbeingfourtimesmorelikelytomakeadigitalpaymentthanthepoorest40percent13.

Asystematicandmacrounderstandingofthepatternsofdiffusionatthesub-nationallevelismissing.Whilepromotingdigitaltransactionsisnotagoalinitself,itspotentialbenefitshavemadeitanintermediateindicatorofinterest.Further,understandingitsdiffusionpatternsisessentialtopreventexclusionofmarginalizedgroupsasdigitalpaymentsbecomethenormandstartreplacingnon-digitalalternatives.This

paperpresentsananalysisofUPIdiffusionin

Indiawiththepurposeofunderstandinghow

inclusiveithasbeen.Thenextsectiondescribes

thedatausedandthemethodologyforthe

overallanalysis.SectionIIIpresentadescriptive

analysisoftrendsovertime,andacrossstates

anddistricts.Thisisfollowedbyaconvergence

analysisofdiffusionusingthesigmameasureof

dispersionandthegammameasureofranking

inSectionIV.SectionVdiscussestheresultsof

cross-sectionalregressionsthatexplaindriversof

digitalpaymentsinIndiaandsomereasonsfor

non-inclusivediffusion.SectionVIconcludes.

pushtowardsdigitalizationhasledtoadramatic

riseininternetpenetrationinIndia.

2.DataandMethodology

ThepaperreliesondatafromPhonePe,thelargest

digitalpaymentsplatforminIndia,withalmost

50percentmarketshareintermsofvolume

andvalueoftransactions(Figure17,Appendix

1).Thedatacoversadoptionbyindividualas

wellasmerchantusers.Itprovidesnumberof

users,numberofappopens,volume(numberof

transactions),andvalueoftransactionsforeach

quarterbetweenthefirstquarterof2018andthe

fourthquarterof2022.

Thenumberofusersrefersto‘registeredusers’,

definedasuniquemobilephonenumbersthat

havedownloadedthePhonePeappandaccepted

theTermsandConditionsdisplayedduringthe

onboardingprocess.Whilethisisameasureof

adoption,itdoesnotimplyactiveusageoftheapp.

Thenumberoftransactionsperpersonprovides

abettermeasureofactiveusage.Inthepaperwe

assessdiffusionusingfourdifferentindicators

1)userpenetration(numberofregisteredusers

11BCGandPhonePePulse(2022).DigitalPaymentsinIndia:AUS$10TrillionOpportunity.RetrievedonFebruary10,2023from

/pulse

-static-api/v1/static/docs/PhonePe_Pulse_BCG_report.pdf

12NPCI(2020).DigitalPaymentsAdoptioninIndia.RetrievedonJanurary262023from:

.in/PDF/npci/knowledge-center/Digital-Payment

-Adoption-in-India-2020.pdf

13Oxfam(2022).IndiaInequalityReport2022:DigitalDivide.RetrievedonJanuary262023from:

https://www.oxfamindia.org/knowledgehub/workingpaper/

india-inequality-report-2022-digital-divide

4

percapita)2)averagenumberoftransactionspercapita3)averagevalueoftransactionspercapitaand4)ticketsize(averagevalueofeachtransaction).Whilethevalueoftransactionspercapitaandticketsizearenotnecessarilymeasuresofhowactivelydigitalpaymentsarebeingused,however,theycanbeinformativeinunderstandingthetypesoftransactionsasystemlikethisisfacilitating,anditsimpactsonefficiencyandoveralleconomicactivity.Dataontheactualdistributionoftransactionvaluesand

socio-economicindicatorsratherthanaverageswouldprovidemoreinsightsonhowdifferentgroupsofthepopulationareleveragingdigitalpayments.

AccordingtoNPCIthelatestreportednumberofuniqueUPIuserswasover33croresinMarch202314whilePhonePereportedover49.14croreregisteredusersinSeptember202315.ThecorrespondingnumberforMarch2023is45.38crore.MostUPIusershaveaccountsonmultiplepaymentapps,sothenumberofactivePhonePeuserswouldlikelybeclosetotheNPCIestimateofactiveUPIuserseventhoughPhonePe’smarketshareintermsofvolumeandvalueisabout50%.WhiletheNPCIestimateservesasabenchmark,theirnumbersarealsoestimatesandaresubjecttosomedegreeofuncertainty.TheremayalsobedifferencesinhowusersaredefinedbyUPIandPhonePe,givingrisetodifferentestimates.GiventhescaleofPhonePe’snetwork,wepresentourfindingsassumingthattrendsforPhonePeadoptionarerepresentativeoftrendsinUPIasawhole.Theremay,however,beuniqueusersforotherpaymentappssuchasPaytmorBHIM,thatcanlimitthegeneralizabilityofthesefindings,

especiallyintheearlyyearsofourdataset(the

marketshareofPhonePewas~30%in2018-

19–seeAppendix1).Butwedon’texpectitto

systematicallyaffectthebroaderfindings.

Theanalysishasbeencarriedoutbothatthe

stateanddistrictlevels.Table1showsthe

othersourcesofdatausedtoexaminehow

regional,demographic,andsocio-economic

factorscorrelatewithadoption.Indicatorsused

includepopulation,income,wealth,poverty

rate,literacyrate,accesstomobilephonesand

theinternet,digitalliteracy,andmeasuresof

financialinclusion.Densityofbankbranchesis

usedasaproxytoexaminehowphysicalfinancial

infrastructuremediatestheadoptionofdigital

payments(especiallyconsequentialinrural

areas),andwhetherdigitalpaymentappssaw

greateruptakeinareasthatwerehardtoreach

forthetraditionalbankingsystem.Whiledata

onsmartphoneownershipwasnotavailable,itis

expectedtobeanimportantpredictor.TableA1,

Appendix2providesdescriptivestatisticsforthe

variablesused.

Inordertocompareindicatorslikethenumber

ofregisteredusers,numberoftransactions,and

transactionamount,wenormalisethedataby

population.Whereunavailable,thepopulation

dataislinearlyinterpolatedtoobtainquarterly

data.Atthestatelevel,thepopulationdatais

sourcedfromtheMinistryofFamilyHealthand

Welfare’s2019projectionsfortheyears2018to

2022.Atthedistrictlevel,weusethepopulation

projectionsbytheUSCensusBureautill2019

andextrapolatefor2021and2022.

14doc20221116125801.pdf(.in)

15

/pulse/explore/user/2022/3/

5

Table1:DataSourcesotherthanPhonePePulse

Indicator

statelevel

Districtlevel

population

AnnualprojectionsbyMOHFW(2019)basedon

20llcensus

Annualuscensusprojectionsbasedon2011

censusExtrapolatedbyauthorsofthispaper

for2021and2022

Income

NetstateDomesticproduct(NSDP)(2018,2022)

(at2011-12constantprices)(RBI)

GDpcomposition

sectoralsharesofgrovalueadded(2018,2022)

(RBIHandbookofstatistics)

Internetpenetration

IndividualInternetpenetration(2020)(IMRB

kantar)

Householdinternetpenetration(2015-16)

(2019-21)(NFHS)

Educationand

Literacy

LiteracyRate(Age15-49)(2015-16)(2019-21)

(NFHS)16

LiteracyRate(Age15-49)(2015-16)(NFHS)

LiteracyRateandsecondaryEducationRate

(2020-21)(NSSMIS)

Digitalskills

percentofpopulationablebrowsetheinternet,to

sendemaiswithattachments(2020)(IMRB

kantar)

percentofpopulationabletosendemailswith

attachents(2020-21)(NSSMIS)

consumption

Meanhouseholdconsumptionexpenditureper

capita(2019)(AIDIS)

Meanhouseholdconsumptionexpenditureper

capita(2019AIDIS)(2014,NSSHCS)

wealth

wealthIndex(2015-16)(2019-21)(NFHS)

poverty

MultidimensionalpovertyHeadcountRatio

(NITIAayogbasedon201516NFHS)

MultidimensionalpovertyHeadcountRatio

(NITIAayogbasedon2015-16NFHS)

FinancialInclusion

percentofhouseholdswithbankaccount(2015-

16)(2019-21)(NFHS)

percentofhouseholdswithbankaccount

(2015-16)(2019-21)(NFHS)

Financial

Infrastructure

Numberofbankbranches(Garg&Gupta,2020)

(SHRUGdatabase)

Numberofbankbranches(GargGupta

2020)(SHRUGdatabase)

Note:NSSMIS:NationalSampleSurvey–MultipleIndicatorSurvey;NSSHCES:HouseholdConsumerExpenditure;NFHS:NationalFamilyHealthSurvey;AIDIS:AllIndiaDebt&InvestmentSurvey;MoHFW:MinistryofHealth&Family.

3.StylisedFactsonDiffusionofDigitalPayments

a.WhileUPIhasbeengainingtractionsincelate2018,theaccelerationfollowingthefirstCOVID-19lockdowninearly2020

isnoticeable.Bothtransactionvaluesand

transactionvolumeshaveincreasedsteadily

sinceApril2020(Figure3).Structuralbreak

testsidentifysignificantshiftsafterthefirst

andsecondlockdown(Appendix3).

16Overallliteracyratesforstatesarecalculatedastheweightedaverageofmaleandfemaleliteracyrates,usingmaleandfemalepopulationsharesasweightsrespectively.Maleandfemalepopulationaretakenfrom2019MoHFWCensuspopulationprojections.Forthedistrictlevel,overallliteracyratesarecalculatedasweightedaverageusingthesexratiooftheentirepopulationasprovidedbytheNHFS,downloadedfromHindustanTimes’Githubextract(

/

HindustanTimesLabs/nfhs-data).Boththeseweightedaveragesincuramarginoferrorduetoweightingbasedonmale-femaleratiosoftheentirepopulation,whiletheliteracyratesarebasedonpopulationaged15-49.

6

Figure3:GrowthinUPITransactions

8

6

4

2

0

zeroMDR1stlockdown2ndlockdown

NO.of

10,000

9,000

8,000

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

Source:NPCI

b.ThegrowthforPhonePemirrorsthatofsetofusers(Figure4).Whilethenumber

UPI.Growthinusersisslowerthangrowthofuserstripledbetween2018and2022,the

invalueandvolumeoftransactions,implyingnumberandvalueoftransactionsincreased

anincreaseinintensityofusebytheexistingbymorethan8times.

Figure4:TransactionVolumeandValueforPhonePehavebeengrowingatasteeperratethanregisteredusers

Figure4a:valueofphonepeTransactionsFigure4b:NumberofphonepeTransactions

Figure4CNumberofRegisteredphonepeusers

Note:PhonePereportsthenumberof‘RegisteredUsers’,whichisthenumberofuniqueusers(identifiedbyuniquemobilephonenumber)whohavedownloadedthePhonePeappandacceptedtheTermsandConditionsdisplayedduringtheonboardingprocess.Onlyasubsetofthesewouldbeactiveusers.

7

c.Leadershippositionsacquiredbystatesfromthetimeoflaunch,haveremainedunchangedintheadoptionanduseofUPI.Amongthestates,DelhiandTelanganahavemaintainedtheirtoppositionsinuserpenetration,transactionspercapita,transactionsvalueperperson,fromthebeginningoftheassessmentperiod(Figure5b,5dand5f).Appendix4providesacomparisonofdiffusionatthestate-levelbetween2018and2022usingchoroplethmaps.Currentusageisalsoseentobeconcentratedinthetopfewstates.Thetoptenstatesaccountedfor80%oftotalnumberoftransactions,andthetopfivestatesaccountedfor62%,whileconstitutingonly64%and29%

ofthepopulationrespectively.Thedistribution

forvalueoftransactionsandnumberofusers

isslightlylessconcentrated–inQ42022,the

toptenstatesaccountedfor78%oftransaction

valueandthetopfivestatesaccountedfor

60%,whileconstitutingonly67%and40%

ofthetotalpopulationrespectively.For

registeredusers,thetoptenstatesaccounted

for72%andthetopfivestatesaccountedfor

44%,whileconstituting68%and41%ofthe

totalpopulationrespectively.TheNortheast

regionasawholehasthepoorestoutcomes

fordiffusion,withArunachalPradeshshowing

somesignsofcatchup.

Figure5:Stateswithhighinitialvaluetendtoremainontop

Figure5a:NumberofRegisteredusersFigure5b:Registereduserpenetration

Figure5c:NumberofTransactionsFigure5dTransactionspercapita

Figure5e:TransactionAmountFigure5f:TransactionAmountperperson

Source:PhonePePulseandpopulationprojectionsfromMinistryofFamilyHealthandWelfare.

8

d.Whileeconomicprosperitymatters,itdoesnotfullyexplaindiffusion.Notallstateswithhighaverageincomepercapita,andnotalldistrictswithhighaveragehouseholdwealthindex,havehighPhonePeuserpenetration(Figure6).Whilethereisageneraltendencyforstateswithlowerincomepercapitaanddistrictsonthelowerendofthewealthindex

tohaveloweruserpenetration,beyonda

threshold-levelofincome,penetrationrates

differdespitesimilarlevelsofaverageincome/

wealth.InFigure6b,thelowest10districts

withrespecttowealthindexhaveamore

uniformdistributionofuserpenetrationas

comparedtothetopdistricts.

Figure6:Userpenetrationandeconomicprosperity

Figure6a:userpenetrationandincomepercapitabystate

Note:orderedfromlefttorightindecreasingorderofaverageincomepercapita

Figure6b:userpenetationoftopandbottomdistrictsbywealthindex

Note:orderedfromlefttorightindecreasingorderofwealthindex

Source:PhonePePulse(2022),NFHS(2019-2021)andNSSAIDIS(2019)

e.Aspirationaldistricts,asidentifiedbythegovernment’sprogramof2018,lagbehindotherdistrictsindiffusion17.Aspirationaldistrictsstartedoffslowandcontinuetolagbehindnon-aspirationaldistrictsbothinpercentageofregisteredusersaswellasaveragenumberoftransactionspercapita.Non-aspirationaldistrictshadrecordedover

1.6timesthenumberofusersandoverdouble

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论