详细解析单独提取10-19英语一最-2015年全国入学考试试题_第1页
详细解析单独提取10-19英语一最-2015年全国入学考试试题_第2页
详细解析单独提取10-19英语一最-2015年全国入学考试试题_第3页
详细解析单独提取10-19英语一最-2015年全国入学考试试题_第4页
详细解析单独提取10-19英语一最-2015年全国入学考试试题_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩34页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Use Readthefollowing Choosethebestword(s) eachnumberedblankandmarkA,B,Cor DonANSWESHEE1.(10 Wehavemoregenesin wepick beour Thoughnot are as"related" asfourth about1%ofgenes.Thatis1astudypublishedfrom theUniversity ofCaliforniaandYale of has2Thestudyis agenome-wideanalysis conducted31932uniquesubjects which4pairs and Thesame wereused bothWhile1%mayseem6,it notsotoageneticist. Asco-author ofthestudyJames ofmedical atUCSanDiegosays, "Mostpeopledonoteven somehowmanageto asfriends who8ourTheteam9developeda"friendship whichcanpredict beyourfriendbasedontheir Thestudy foundthat thegenesfor weresomething sharedin notgenesfor genesis now.10, astheteamsuggests, drawsus11similar moreto Therecould bemanymechanismsworking tandemthat 12usin geneticallysimilarfriends13"functionalkinship"ofbeingfriendswith14!Oneoftheremarkablefindingsofthestudywasthatthesimilargenesseemtobeevolving15thanothergenes.Studyingthiscouldhelp16whyhumanevolutionpickedpaceinthelast30,000years,withsocialenvironmentbeingamajor17factor.Thefindings donot 18tobefriend 19backgrounds, saythe Thoughall weredrawnfroma ofEuropeanextraction, carewastakento20that weretaken fromthe samepopulation. Theteamalso thedatatocheckancestry [A]when [B]why [C]how [D]what2.[A]defended [B]concluded [C]withdrawn [D]advised3.[A]for [B]with [C]on [D]by4.[A]compared [B]sought [C]separated [D]connected5.[A]tests [B]objects [C]samples [D]examples6.[A]insignificant [B]unexpected [C]unreliable [D]incredible7.[A]visit [B]miss [C]seek [D]know8.[A]resemble [B]influence [C]favor [D]surpass9.[A]again [B]also [C]instead [D]thus10.[A]Meanwhile [B]Furthermore [C]Likewise [D]Perhaps11.[A]about [B]to [C]from [D]like12.[A] [B]observe [C]confuse [D]limit13.[A]accordingto [B]ratherthan [C]regardlessof [D]alongwith14.[A]chances [B]responses [C]missions [D]benefits15.[A]later [B]slower [C]faster [D]earlier16.[A]forecast [B]remember [C]understand [D]express17.[A]unpredictable [B]contributory [C]controllable [D]disruptive18.[A]endeavor [B]decision [C]arrangement [D]tendency19.[A]political [B]religious [C]ethnic [D]economic20.[A]see [B]show [C]prove [D]tell Readthefollowing Answerthe beloweachtext bychoosingA,B,Cor D.Markyour answersonANSWESHEE1.(40points)KingJuanCarlosofSpainonceinsisted“kingsonadicate,theydieintheirsleep. BtembarrassingscandalsandthepopularityoftherepublicanleftintherecentEuro-electionshaveforcedhimtoeathiswordsandstanddown.So,doestheSpanishcrisissuggestthatmonarchyisseeingitslastdays?DoesthatmeanthewritingisonthewallforallEuropeanroyals,withtheirmagnificentuniformsandmajesticlifestyles?TheSpanishcaseprovidesargumentsbothforandagainstmonarchy.Whenpublicopinionisparticularlypolarised,asitwasfollowingtheendoftheFrancoregime,monarchscanriseabove“mere”poalitidspItisthisapparenttranscendenceofpoliticsthatexplainsmonarchscontinuingpopularityasheadsofstate.Andso,theMiddleEastexcepted,Europeisthemostmonarch-infestedregionintheworld,with10kingdoms(notcountingVaticanCityandAndorra).ButunliketheirabsolutistcounterpartsintheGulfandAsia,mostroyalfamilieshavesurvivedbecausetheyallowvoterstoavoidthedifficult searchforanon-controversialbutrespectedpublicEvenso,kingsandqueensundoubtedlyhaveadownside.Symbolicofnationalunityastheyclaimtobe,theirveryhistory sodeprivilegesandinequalities.AtatimewhenThomasPikettyandothereconomistsarewarningofrisinginequalityandtheincreasingpowerofinheritedwealth,itisbizarrethatwealthyaristocraticfamiliesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartofmoderndemocraticstates.Themostsuccessfulmonarchiesstrivetoabandonorhidetheiroldaristocraticways.Princesandprincesseshaveday-jobsandridebicycles,nothorses(orhelicopters).Evenso,thesearewealthyfamilieswhopartywiththeinternational1%,andmediaintrusivenessmakesitincreasinglydifficult tomaintaintherightimage.WhileEurope rchieswill nodoubtbesmartenoughtosurviveforsometimetocome,itistheBritishroyalswhohavemosttofearfromtheSpanishexample.ItisonlytheQueenwhohaspreservedthe ttin herratherordinarywell-heeled)grannystyle.ThedangerwillcomewithCharles,whohasbothanexpensivetasteoflifestyleandaprettyhierarchicalviewoftheworld.Hehasfailedtounderstandthatmonarchieshavelargelysurvivedbecausetheyprovideaservice——asnon-controversialandnon-politicalheadsofstate.CharlesoughttoknowthatasEnglishhistoryshows,itiskings,notrepublicans,whoarethe tothefirsttwoParagraphs,KingJuanCarlosof usedtoenjoyhighpubliceasedhisrelationshipwithhisendedhisreignin arekeptasheadsofstateinEurope owingtotheirundoubtedandtoachieveabalancebetweentraditionandtogivevotersmorepublicfigurestolookupduetotheireverlastingpoliticalWhichofthe isshowntobeodd,accordingto excesiveTheroleofthenobilityinmodernThesimplelifestyleofthearistocraticThe eencThe royals“eostto cse

os takesaroughlineonpoliticalfailstochangehislifestyleastakesrepublicansashispotentialfailstoadapthimselftohisfutureWhichofthe isthebesttitleoftheCarlos,GloryandDisgraceCharles,AnxioustoSucceedtotheCarlos,aLessonforAllEuropeanCharles,SlowtoReacttotheComingJusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupremeCourtwillnowconsiderwhetherpolicecansearchthecontentsofamobilephonewithoutawarrantifthephoneisonoraroundapersonduringanarrest.Californiahasaskedthejusticestorefrainfromasweepingruling,particularlyonethatupsetstheassumptionthatauthoritiesmaysearchthroughthepossessionsofsuspectsatthetimeoftheirarrest.Itishard,thestateargues,forjudgestoassesstheimplicationsofnewandrapidlychangingtechnologies.ThecourtwouldberecklesslymodestifitfollowedCaliforniaadvieEnoughoftheimplicationsarediscernable,evenobvious,sothatthejusticescanandshouldprovideupdatedguidelinestopolice,lawyersTheyshouldstartbydiscardingCalifornia ravaststorehouseofdigitalinformation—issimilarto,say,goingthroughasuspect .Thecourt ruledthatpolicedonvltetheFourthAmendmentwhentheygothroughthewalletorpocketbookofansmsmartphonemaycontainanarrestee reigcloomputing,explorationsomuchthe

menwhile,Americansshouldtakestepstoprotecttheirdigitalprivacy.Butkeepingsensitiveinformationonthesedevicesisincreasinglyarequirementofnormallife.Citizensstillhavearighttoexpectprivatedocumentstoremainprivateandprotectedbythe prohiitononAssooftenisthecase,statingthatprincipledoesn aethechallengeofline-drawing. Inmanycases,itwouldnotbeoverlyburdensomeforauthoritiestoobtainawarranttosearchthroughphonecontents.TheycouldstillinvalidateFourthAmendmentprotectionswhenfacingsevere,urgentcircumstances,andtheycouldtakereasonablemeasurestoensurethatphonedataarenoterasedoralteredwhilewaitingforawarrant.Thecourt,though,maywanttoallowroomforpolicetocitesituationswheretheyareentitledtomorefreedom.ButthejusticesshouldnotswallowCalifornia argentwhole.New,disruptivetechnologysometimesdemandsnovelapplicationsoftheConstitution ectionsexplosionandaccessibilityofdigitalinformationinthe21stcenturywiththeestablishmentofautomobileuseasavirtualnecessityoflifeinthe20th:Thejusticeshadtospecifynovelrulesforthenewpersonaldomainofthepassengercarthen;theymustsortouthowtheFourthAmendmentappliestodigitalinformationnow.TheSupremeCourtwillworkoutwhether,duringanarrest,itislegitimate preventsuspectsfromdeletingtheirphonesearchforsuspectsmoilephoneswithoutachecksuspectsecontentswithoutbeingprohibitsuspectsfromusingtheirmobileThe

isone Theauthorbelievesthatexploringoneoecontentsiscomparable gettingintoonersidenchandlingonehstoricalcorrespongoingthroughoneInParagraph5and6,theauthorshowshisconcern principlesarehardtobeclearlythecourtisgivingpolicelessroomfor privcyisnoteffectivelyphonesareusedtostoresensitiveOrin co theConstitutionshouldbeimplementednewtechnologyrequiresreinterpretationofthe argentviolates oftheprinciplesoftheConstitutionshouldneverbeThejournalScienceisaddinganextraroundofstatisticalcheckstoitspeer-revieweditor-in-chiefMarciaMcNuttannouncedtoday.Thepolicyfollowssimilareffortsfromotherjournals,afterwidespreadconcernthatbasicmistakesindataanalysisarecontributingtotheirreproducibilityofmanypublishedresearchfindings.“Readersusthaveconfidenceintheconclusionspublishedinourjournal, writsMcNuttinaneditorial.WorkingwiththeAmericanStatisticalAssociation,thejournalhasappointedsevenexpertstoastatisticboardofreviewingeditors(SBoRE).Manuscriptwillbeflaggedupforadditionalscrutinyby innaleditors,orbyitsexistingBoardofReviewingEditorsorbyoutsidepeerreviewers.TheSBoREpanelwillthenfindexternalstatisticianstoreviewthesemanuscripts.Askedwhetheranyparticularpapershadimpelled uttsaid:“Treationof‘statistioardsmotivatedbyconcernsbroadlywiththeapplicationofstatisticsanddataanalysisscientificresearchandispartof elldrivetoincrease intheresearchwe GiovanniParmigiani,abiostatisticianattheHarvardSchoolofPublicHealth,amemberoftheSBoREgroup,saysheexpectstheboardto“plrimarilyanadvisoryrole. HagreedfounheforesightbehindtheestablishmentoftheSBoREtobenovel,uniqueandlikelytohavealastingimpact.ThisimpactwillnotonlybethroughthepublicationsinScienceitself,buthopefullythroughalargergrouppublishingplacesthatmaywanttomodeltheirapproachafter JohnIoannidis,aphysicianwhostudiesresearchmethodology,saysthatthepolicyis“most stepforward d“longverdue. Mojournalsofwhattheypublish.Ithinkthat,forthemajorityofscientificpapersnowadays,statisticalreviewismoreessentialthanexpertreview, hesays.ButhenotedthatbiomedicaljournalssuchasAnnalsofInternalMedicine,theJournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociationandTheLancetpaystrongattentiontostatisticalProfessionalscientistsareexpectedtoknowhowtoanalyzedata,butstatisticalerrorsarealarminglycommoninpublishedresearch,accordingtoDavidVaux,acellbiologist.Researchersshouldimprovetheirstandards,hewrotein2012,butjournalsshouldalsotakeatougherline,“engagieviewerswhoarestatisticallyliterateandeditorswhocanverifytheprocess.Vxsays ideatopasstostatisticians“hassomemerit,butaweaknessisthatitreliesontheboardofreviewingeditorstotaperse Itcanbelearnedfrom 1 Scienceintendstosimplifyitspeer-reviewjournalsarestrengtheningtheirstatisticalfewjournalsareblamedformistakesinlackofdataanalysisiscommoninThephrase“flaggeup(Para.2)istheclosestinmeaning Giovanni believesthattheestablishmentoftheSBoRE poseathreattoallitsmeetwithstrongScienc’circulationsetanexampleforotherDavidVauxholdsthatwhatScienceisdoing addstoresearchersworkladdiminishestheroleofhasroomforfurtheristofailintheWhichofthe isthebesttitleoftheScienceJoinsPushtoScreenStatisticsinProfessionalStatisticiansDeserveMoreDataAnalysisFindsItsWayonto StatisticiansAreComingBackwithTwoyearsago,Rupert t,Elisabeth,spokeofthe“unsettlingearthofintegritysomanyofourinstitutions. hadonly“sortingechanism insocietyshouldbeprofitandthemarket.But“it,manbeings,wethepeoplewhocreatethesocietywewant,notprofit. ncralanguagewithingovernment,mediaorbusinesscould eoneofthemostdangerousgoalsforcapitalismandfreedom.TissameabsenceofmoralpurposewaswoundingcompaniessuchasNewsInternational,shethought,makingitmorelikelythatitwouldloseitswayasithadwithwidespreadillegaltelephoneAsthehackingtrialconcludes——findingguiltyoneex-editoroftheNewsoftheWorld,AndyCoulson,forconspiringtohackphones,andfindinghispredecessor,RebekahBrooks,innocentofthesamecharge—thewiderissueofdearthofintegritystillstands,Journalistsareknowntohavehackedthephonesofupto5,500people.Thisishackingonanindustrialscale,aswasacknowledgedbyGlennMulcaire,themanhiredbytheNewsoftheWorldin2001tobethepointpersonforphonehacking.Othersawaittrial.Thislongstorystillunfolds.Inmanyrespects,thedearthofmoralpurposeframesnotonlythefactofsuchwidespreadphonehackingbutthetermsonwhichthetrialtookplace.OneoftheastonishingrevelationswashowlittleRebekahBrooksknewofwhatwentoninhernewsroom,howlittleshethoughttoaskandthefactthatsheneverinquiredhowthestoriesarrived.Thecoreofhersuccessfuldefencewasthatsheknewnothing.Intodayrl,ithas enormalthatwell-paidexecutivesshouldnotbeaccountableforwhathappensintheorganizationsthattheyrun.Perhapsweshouldnotbesosurprised.Forageneration,thecollectivedoctrinebeenthatthesortingmechanismofsocietyshouldbeprofit.Thewordsthathavematteredareefficiency,shareholdervalue,business–frienelyl,thgeneration,sales,impactand,innewspapers,circulation.Wordsdegradedtothemarginhavebeenjustice,fairness,tolerance,proportionalityandaccountability.ThepurposeofeditingtheNewsoftheWorldwasnottopromotereaderunderstanding,tobefairinwhatwaswrittenortobetrayanycommonhumanity.Itwastoruinlivesinthequestforcirculationandimpact.MsBrooksmayormaynothavehadsuspicionsabouthowherjournalistsgottheirstories,butsheaskednoquestions,gavenoinstructions crtraceable,recordedanswers. tothefirsttwoparagraphs,Elisabethwasupset theconsequencesofthecurrentsortingfinncialgovernmentalineffectivenessonmoralthewidemisuseofintegrityamongItcanbe from 3 GlemMulcairemaydenyphonehackingasamorejournalistsmaybefoundguiltyofphoneAndyCoulsonshouldbeheldinnocentofthephonehackingwillbeacceptedoncertainTheauthorbelievestheRebekah revealedacunningcenteredontrivialwashardlywaspartofaTheauthorholdsthatthe collectivedoctrine generallydistortedunfairwealthamarginalizedarigidmoralWhichofthe issuggestedinthelastThequalityofwritingisofprimaryCommonhumanityiscentraltonewsMoralawarenessmattersineditingaJournalistsneedstricterindustrial Inthefollowing text,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableonefromthefistA-Gtofitintoeachofthenumberedblanks.Therearetwoextrachoices,whichdonotfitinanyofthegaps.MarkyouranswersonANSWERSHEET.(10points)Howdoesyourreadingproceed?Clearlyyoutrytocomprehend,inthesenseofidentifying meaningsforindividualwordsandworkingoutrelationshipsbetweenthem,drawingonyourimplicit knowledgeofEnglishgrammar.(41) .Youbegintoinferacontextforthetext,forinstance,bymakingdecisionsaboutwhatkindofspeecheventisinvolved.Whoismakingtheutterance,towhom,whenandwhere?Thewaysofreadingindicatedherearewithoutdoubtkindsofcomprehension.Buttheyshowcomprehensiontoconsistnotjustofpassiveassimilationbutofactiveengagementininferenceandproblem-solving.Youinferinformation youfeelthewriterhasinvitedyoutograspbypresentingyouwithspecificevidenceandclues.(42)Conceivedinthisway,comprehensionwillnot exactlythesametrackforeachreader.Whatisinquestionnottheretrievalofanabsolute,fixedor“truemeningthatcanbereadoffandcheckedforaccuracy,orsometimelessrelationofthetexttotheworld.(43)Suchbackgroundmaterialinevitablyreflectswhoweare.(44) .Thisdoesn hot,ever,merelyrelativeorevenpointless.Preciselybecausereadersfromdifferenthistoricalperiods,placesandsocialexperiencesproducedifferentbutoverlappingreadingsofthesamewordsontheincludingfortextsthatengagewithfundamentalhumanconcernsdebatesabouttextscanplayanimportantroleinsocialdiscussionofbeliefsandvalues.Howwereadagiventextalsodependstosomeextentonourparticularinterestinreadingit. .dimensionsofreadingsuggestasothersintroducedlaterinthebookwillalsodothatwebringanimplicit unacknowledged)agendatoanyactofreading.Itdoesn nnecessarilyfollow thatonekindofreadingisfuller,moreadvancedormoreworthwhilethananother.Ideally,differentkindsofreadinginformeachother,andactasusefulreferencepointsforandcounterbalancestooneanother.Together,theymakeupthereadingcomponentofyouroverallliteracy,orrelationshiptoyoursurroundingtextualenvironment.Arewestudyingthattextandtryingtorespondinawaythat therequirementofagivencourse?itsimply forpleasure?Skimming itforinformation? Waysofreadingonatrainorinbedarelikely todifferconsiderablyfromreadinginaseminarroom.Factorssuchastheplaceandperiodinwhichwearereading,ourgender,ethnicity,ageandsocialclassencourageustowardscertaininterpretationsbutatthesametimeobscureorevencloseoffIfyouareunfamiliarwithwordsoridioms,youguessattheirmeaning,usingcluespresentedinthecontext.Ontheassumptionthattheywill erelevantlater,youmakeamentalnoteofdiscourseentitiesaswellaspossiblelinksbetweenthem.Ineffect,youtrytoreconstructthelikelymeaningsoreffectsthatanygivensentence,imageorreferencehavehad:Thesemightbetheonestheauthor make inferences, instance,about thetext be to or —inferetnctsformthebasisofapersonalresponseforwhichtheauthorwillinevitably befarlessInplays,novelsandnarrativepoems,charactersspeakasconstructscreatedbytheauthor,notnecessarilymouthpiecesfortheauthorothoughts.Rather,weascribemeaningstotextsonthebasisofinteractionbetweenwhatwemightcalltextualcontextualmaterial:betweenkindsoforganizationorpatterningweperceiveina m structuresespeciallyitslanguagestructures)andvariouskindsofbackground,socialknowledge,beliefandattitudethatwebringtothetext.PartCReadthefollowingtextcarefullyandthentranslatetheunderlinedsegmentsintoChinese.YourtranslationshouldbewrittenneatlyontheANSWERSHEET.(10points)Withinthespanofahundredyears,intheseventeenthandearlyeighteenthcenturies,atideofemigration—oneofthegreatfolkwanderingsofhistory—sweptfromEuropetoAmerica.(46)Thismovement,drivenpowerfulanddiversemotivations,builtanationoutofawildernessand,byitsnature,shapedthecharacteranddestinyofanunchartedcontinent.(47)TheUnitedStatesistheproductoftwoprincipalforces—theimmigrationofEuropeanpeopleswithvariedideas,customs,andnationalcharacteristicsandtheimpactofanewcountrywhichmodifiedthesetraits.Ofnecessity,colonialAmericawasaprojectionofEurope.AcrosstheAtlanticcamesuccessivegroupsofEnglishmen,Frenchmen,Germans,Scots,Irishmen,Dutchmen,Swedes,andmanyotherswhoattemptedtotransplanttheirhabitsandtraditionstothenewworld.(48)But,theforceofgeographicconditionspeculiartoAmerica,theinterplayofthevariednationalgroupsupononeanother,andthesheerdifficulty ofmaintainingold-worldwaysinaraw,newcontinentcausedsignificantchanges.Thesechangesweregradualandatfirstscarcelyvisible.Buttheresultwasanewsocialpatternwhich,althoughitresembledEuropeansocietyinmanyways,hadacharacterthatwasdistinctlyAmerican.(49)ThefirstshiploadsofimmigrantsboundfortheterritorywhichisnowtheUnitedStatescrossedtheAtlanticmorethanahundredyearsafterthe15th-and-16th-centuryexplorationsofNorthAmerica.Inthemeantime,thrivingSpanishcolonieshadbeenestablishedinMexico,theWestIndies,andSouthAmerica.ThesetravelerstoNorthAmericacameinsmall,unmercifullyovercrowdedcraft.Duringtheirsix-totwelve-weekvoyage,theysurvivedonbarelyenoughfoodallottedtothem.Manyoftheshipswerelostinstorms,manypassengersdiedofdisease,andinfantsrarelysurvivedthejourney.Sometimesstormsblewthevesselsfarofftheircourse,andoftencalmbroughtunbearablylongTotheanxioustravelersthesightoftheAmericanshorebroughtalmostinexpressiblerelief.SaidoneTheit Te firstglimpseofthenewlandwasasightofdensewoods.50)Thevirginforestwithitsrichnessandvarietyoftreeswasarealtreasure-housewhichextendedfromMaineallthewaydowntoGeorgia.Herewasabundantfuelandlumber.Herewastherawmaterialofhousesandfurniture,shipsandpotash,dyesandnavalstores.SectionIII PartA51.Youaregoingtohostaclubreadingsession.Writeanemailofabout100words mendingabooktotheclubmembers.Youshouldstatereasonsforyour YoushouldwriteneatlyontheANSWERSHEET.DoDonotsignyourownnameattheendoftheletter.UseLiMinginstead.Donotwritetheaddress.(10points)Part52.Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthe drawing.Inyouressayyoudescribethedrawingexplainitsintendedmeaning,giveyourYoushouldwriteneatlyontheANSWERSHEET.(20 SectionIUseof 2014年7月15日InternationalBusinessTimes上一篇题为“DNAofFriendship:StudyFindsWeareGeneticallyLinkedtoOurFriends”(DNA友谊:研究发现我们在基因上和我们的朋友有着千丝万 whyhowwhat【答案】 原因(why)和方式(how),表示具体内容的表语从句用 what引导,因此,该题的答案为 concludedwithdrawn【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】从此题所在句子的前后内容可以判断出, thatis 中的that是指第一句话的内容(朋友 forwithon在⋯by【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】根据空格所在句子的内容(研究 1932uniquesubjects。Conductanalysison⋯是固定表达。sought【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】该空格所在的句子是 which引导的定语从句修饰 。因为“研究”的内容是关于朋友间基因上的相关性问题, 【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 samples。选项A.测试,B.物体,D.事例均insignificantunreliableincredible【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 JamesFowler对这1%基因的态度是肯定 A。visitknow【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析本题空格处考查了动词,解题的关键是确定主 peopl( D选 D。influencefavor【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】空格处要求填入一个及物动词,能够直接接宾语 B选项“影响他们的亲戚C“支持他们的亲戚”, D选项“超过他们的亲戚”均无上下文依据,根据全文中心导向:基因上的 A选项“像他们亲戚”符合上下文语义,故答案为 A。【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】空格处要求填入的副词修饰动词“ Thestudy⋯”,显然讨论的 thegenesforsmellweresomethingsharedinfriends(朋友间在嗅觉基因方面有相关性)”在进一步详细讨论该话题,前后之间是顺接关系,A选项强调同样的东西再一次提及 C选项表示对比转折 D选项表示因果关系 只有选项also表示顺接递进关系,故答案为 B。MeanwhileFurthermoreLikewise【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔接+【解析】从选项和文中句子结构可以判断,空格处要求填入一个能够体现前后两个句子逻辑关系的副 tofromlike【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】该题为介词选择题。后半句出现比较级,可见是和前文形成比较关系,因此和上半句介词保持一致,用介词to。该句翻译:它(这种相似性)吸引我们到相同的环境,并且使我们更为相似。因此答案为to。drivelimit【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】该句意思为:很多机制共同作用,从而 sb.indoingsth.,B选项 C选项confuse(困惑)均无此用法。符合该结构只有 A选项drive(驱使)和 D选项limit(限制)。根据上下文可得知:这些机制驱使我们选择基因相似的朋友,符合文章主题。如果 accordingtoratherthanregardlessofalongwith【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 B选项ratherthan。A选accordingto(根据)没有体现出对立及取舍关系,因此排除; C选项regardlessof(不管)表让步关系, D选项alongwith(伴随)表顺接,故排除。故答案为ratherthan。missions【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】根据前文 functionalkinship(实用关系)可得出 D选项benefits(利益),前后形成呼应。 选项chances(机会)、B选项response(反应)、C选项missions(使命)均不符合题意。故答案为laterslowerearlier【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】该句为:evolving thanothergenes(比其他基因进化得 ).根据同词复现,我们 humanevolutionpickedpaceinthelast30,000years(人类进化在过去 提速)。C选项faster与下文pickedpace(加速)形成呼应,故答案为 【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】此题考查动宾搭配。根据语意。空格后面是一 why引导的宾语从句,意为“人类进化在 项understand。A选项forecast“预测”与“过去三万年”相矛盾,B选项remember“记住”和D选项“express”均不符合文意。contributorycontrollabledisruptive【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】此空需要填入一个形容词,表达社会环境对人类进步所起到的作用。 Help,pickpace这两个 A选项“不可预测的”和D选项“破坏性的”;B而C选项“可控的”,与语意无关;因此正确答案为B选项contributorydecision【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】此处进一步陈述这一研究的结论 A选项endeavor“努力”,B选项“决定”,C选项“安排D选项“倾向”。本文的主旨重在解释人们交朋友时不自觉的一种倾向,而非通过人为的有意识的举 politicalreligious【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】结合文意,人们普遍希望和有相似 C选项ethnic意为“种族的,民族 genes,以及下文的thesamepopulation的同义复现。因此正确答案为C。A选项political“政治的”,B选项“宗教的”,D选项“经济的”均不符合原文文意。tell【答案】【考点】上下文语义衔 【解析】此处考察动词,动词势必要看前后搭配。Seethat构成固定词组,意为“务必使⋯⋯”,符合文意,即:即使所有的受访者都拥有欧洲血统,(研究者们)仍然悉心确保所有的受访者、朋友和陌生人都来自于同一群种。选项B“展示”,选项C“证明”,选项D“辨别”均无此含义,且不符合文意。 1932位独特的实验对象进行了全基因组分析,对没有血缘关系的朋友和没有血缘关系的陌尽管这1%看起来似乎微不足道, SectionIIReadingPartText 2014年6月4日《卫报》上一篇题为“IstheWritingontheWallforAllEuropeanRoyals(所【答案】【考点】事实细节【解析】根据题干要求,定位到文章前两段。而文章第一段的第二句话提 andthepopularityoftherepublicanleftintherecentEuro-electionshaveforcedhimtoeathiswordsand.退位)。Dendreign是“standown”的同义置换,且“embarrassmenCarlos卸任的原embarrassinscandals是相呼应的。故D是正确答案。A 、B项在欧洲皇室中不受欢迎 、C项缓和他与对手的关系 【答案】【考点】事实细节【解析根据题干关键 monarch“heaof “...motylhavesurvivedbecausetheyallowvoterstoavoidthedifficult searchforanon-controversialbutrespected. “non-controversialbutrespectedpublicfigure”是A选项中“undoubteandrespectablestatus的义置换。故 A是正确答案。B项实现传统和现实的平 C项给选民更多的公众人物去检 ,是原文是避免去寻找一个不受争议且受尊敬的公众人物的困难 ,并未提到检查,故C项属于偷换概念。D项由于他们永久的政治体现 中的“everlasting永久的)偷换了原文中的 “tcne(的)故错误。【答案】【考点】事实细节【解析根据题干要求和关键词 od(奇怪的)直接定位在第四段的最后一句话 “...itisbizarrethatwealthyaristocraticfamiliesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartofmoderndemocraticstates.(富的贵族仍作为现代 )其中,“thsymbolicheartofmoderndemocraticstates”B项中“throleofthenobilityinmoderndemocracies的同义置换,故 B项正确。【答案】【考点】事实细节 ⋯⋯。根据题干专有名词 Charles可定位到文章第七段“thedangerwillcomewithCharles...worstenemies”。本段指出“危险源自于查尔斯,他生活奢靡, 选项D意为适应未来身份失败 与选项D选项A意为对待政治问题态度强硬 B意为对待建议的生活方式改变失败 C意为视共和党人为潜在盟友 , Charles的盟友,属于偷换概念,故错误。【答案】【考点】主旨大意【解析】该题考察四个选项中哪个可作为文章最佳标题。本文从西班牙国王Carlos被迫退位事件切入, 虑和查尔斯—应对威胁缓慢。而选项卡洛斯—荣辱并存和卡洛斯—欧洲君王们的前车之A属于细节信息,不能概括文章大意,选项C可概括全文,故为正确答案。另外,文章主题词Monarch只有在选项C中出现,也可作为迅速解题的依据。Symbolicofnationalunityastheyclaimtobe,theirveryhistory soetimes —emboitdatedandindefensibleprivilegesandinequalities.【解析】本句的主干是 theirveryhistoryembodiesoutdatedandindefensibleprivilegesandinequalities,谓 as引导让步状语从句, as的意思是“虽然”。双破折号中间的内容为插AtatimewhenThomasPikettyandothereconomistsarewarningofrisinginequalityandtheincreasingpowerofinheritedwealth,itisbizarrethatwealthyaristocraticfamiliesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartofmoderndemocraticstates.【解析】句子的主干为itisbizarrethatwealthyaristocraticfamiliesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartmoderndemocraticstates,其中it为形式主语,that引导主语从句。前半句中when引导定语从句,限定前面的time。【译文】就在托马斯·皮克提和其他经济学家提醒大家要警惕这种不断加剧的不平等和继承财富力量CharlesoughttoknowthatasEnglishhistoryshows,itiskings,notrepublicans,whoarethe worst【解析】本句的主干是 Charlesoughttoknowthat⋯”,其中that引导宾语从句。该宾语从句的主干itiskings,notrepublicans,whoarethe stenemies,其中itis⋯who为强调句型,强内容是kings,notrepublicans是插入语, asEnglishhistoryshows as理解为正如⋯⋯一样insistvt.&vi.坚持,强调 insiston/upon坚持,坚决要abdicatevt.&vi. magnificentadjpolarisevt.&vi(使)极化;两极分 infestedadj.为患的,大批滋生的(常 with搭配privilegennon-controversialadj.一致的,无争议的 controversyn.争论;论战;辩inheritedadj.遗传的;继承权的;通过继承得到的 v.继承(inherit的过去分词bizarreadj奇异的(指态度,容貌,款式等aristocraticadj.贵族的;贵族政治的;有贵族气派的;如 intrusiveadj.侵入的;打扰preservevt.保存;保护;维持 reputationn.hierarchicaladj.分层的;等级体系的西班牙国王胡安卡洛斯曾坚称:“国王不会退位,只会在睡梦中离世。”但是令人尴尬的丑闻和共和他们现今的行为举止——却象征着过时且站不住脚的特权和不平等现象。就在托马斯·皮克提和其他经济 Text 2014

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论